Friday, July 23, 2010

From the Simple Justice blog:

The above photo was not found on the Simple Justice blog, it is [found here]

The below cut and pasted, from:

Blame Me, Cop Edition

It's terrible that police officer deaths in the line of duty are up 43% this year over last. Not because the death of police officers, regardless of how "line of duty" is defined, are more significant than the death of any other person, but because the untimely death of a person who happens to be a police officer is as significant and unfortunate.

That doesn't make it my fault, however. Via FoxNews:

Eugene O'Donnell, professor of police studies at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said the number of officer fatalities fluctuates from year to year. However, he said he has noticed an "alarming frequency" of people targeting police.

"There has been a spate of particularly brutal and senseless attacks on the police," said O’Donnell, a former police officer and prosecutor in New York. "It seems to me, an unprecedented level of disrespect and willingness to challenge police officers all over the place."

He said a rise in mental health problems and scathing criticism of police, such as the comments found on some blogs, could be fueling the brazenness and disregard for authority.

Could that be true? Possibly, though there's absolutely nothing to suggest it aside from O'Donnell's facile use of the statistic to lash out at "enemies of the police." Hey, why not? You love police. You hate critics of police. The opportunity is available, and it's not like people think hard enough to realize that you're just making it up. At least some people will buy it, in any event.

I don't buy it. Aside from the total absence of any substantive basis to support the claim, and despite the fact that many of the deaths were the result of vehicular negligence (yeah, maybe people were negligent because they were reading SJ on their Kindle while driving. It could happen.), let's consider this in terms of cause and effect.

The content here about police is almost invariably in reaction to something a police officer has done.or failed to do. We(meaning bloggers who are disinclined to be police apologists) don't make them do it. If it was up to us, they wouldn't do it. It's not, and they do it anyway. Only then do we write.

But O'Donnell claims that out highlighting and criticizing wrongdoing on the part of police "[fuels] the brazenness and disregard for authority." Well, yeah, guilty on the disregard for authroity part. But there is a monumental leap, even if it were factually connected, between criticizing police and the "brazenness", assuming there's a factual basis for such a claim, with which people deal with cops.

Clearly, the expectation of people like O'Donnell is that the public should obey and be compliant. I can hear the choir in the background singing, "it's a very hard job to be a cop." The song strikes a sour note. Contrary to the viewpoint of some police officers, as well as academics like O'Donnell who view the citizenry as existing to be subject to authority, it's not our job as human beings to be compliant with the every whim of the cops. They're the ones being paid to "protect and serve," not to dominate and control. Worse yet, not to engage in conduct that results in the needless death of people at their hands. We're getting just a wee bit tired of hearing the police officer say "oops, it was an accident."

The problem, at least for me, is that the needless deaths of people at the hands of police are just as tragic as the needless deaths of police officers. The difference is that when a police officer dies at the hand of a criminal, it's at the hand of a criminal. Criminals are, by definition, functioning outside the law, and are behaving in a way that society does not tolerate. Criminals are not the bar by which police officer conduct is judged. When deaths occur at the hands of police officers, they can't be excused because of the behavior of criminals. Society expects police officers to conduct themselves better than criminals.

And so bloggers are critical when police officers engage in misconduct, abuse, stupidity and violence. We do so because police officers behave this way. We do so because other police officers conceal and excuse such behavior by their blue brothers. We do not cause this behavior, and we're not responsible for it happening.

If there is any truth whatsoever to O'Donnell's claim, and I doubt there is, then don't place the deaths of police officers at our feet. Cops act. We react. If you want to change the equation, go to the source. And if the complaint is that those of us who report or opine on the improper and criminal conduct of cops encourage or enable those who are otherwise inclined to do harm to police, then there's an easy way to shut us up. Stop the misconduct, abuse, stupidity and violence.

What a glorious day it would be if there was nothing negative to say about cops.

H/T Balko Stumbleupon Technorati Digg

  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.

  • 7/23/2010 11:50 AM Windypundit wrote:
    Well said, Scott. If O'Donnell is trying to blame police deaths on increased criticism of police, it's only fair to ask if increased criticism of police is due to increased police misconduct. Also, if he's going to complain about "disrespect and willingness to challenge police officers" he really should explain why that's a bad thing. If you believe people should be responsible for their actions, then bad cops deserve our disrespect.
    Reply to this
    1. 7/23/2010 11:56 AM SHG wrote:
      Your comment just made me think of something else: Maybe it's not increased police misconduct, but the clarity or certainty of it based on the increase in the pervasiveness of video. There were always allegations, but now we can see it happen, and suddenly the old lies and excuses don't wash.
      Reply to this
  • 7/23/2010 4:00 PM Professor Nutbutter wrote:
    I think the increase in risk springs from repeated and systematic violations of the 9 Peelian Principles of Policing:

    #1 The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.
    #2 The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions.
    #3 Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.
    #4 The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.
    #5 Police seek and preserve public favor not by catering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.
    #6 Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient.
    #7 Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
    #8 Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.
    #9 The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.
    Reply to this

* * * *
* * * *

There are more than 3 times more cops than there were just a few short years ago. Way more cops, means more cops die. If you are knee deep in cops in America, they can die of old age, from killing each other, from drug overdoses, eating too much, pissing off the wrong citizens, being caught cheating etc ...

his blogger owned 3 rental properties. The Stafford Springs "Town Clowns" and Connecticut State Police were too busy writing soccer moms tickets, trying to get laid, sleeping with prostitutes, fucking off, and harassing taxpaying, home owning citizens to protect and serve. The ones I dealt with had more "business" and "personal" relationships with drug dealers, vandals, prostitutes, thieves, and scum of the earth. Citizens who got in the way of crime could find their families broken up, losing their home, and railroaded off to prison. If some cops are acting like complete scumbags, and there is no quality of control of cops if they police themselves, I can see why some citizens snap. My story:

These are the US top "watchdogs", are these Corporatist Bankster scumbags at fault for the destruction of America:

Will the woman below be a "good cop" when she returns home from a war zone?:

[photo source]


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Hit Counter