Time to Dump the Federal Government
If the Government wants to grope 3 year old's genitals at airports, it is time to dump the federal government. It is bad enough they are ripping off our last dollar. It is bad enough they are using our tax dollars to send our jobs oversees. It is time to fire them. It is in the US Constitution that we may fire them all, isn't it?
"Federal Blockade"/ "Financial Terrorism"
Text with below video:
Tex Rep. David Simpson: DOJ Threatens to Cancel Airflights into Texas in Response to TSA Ban Bill
Alex Jones & Fellow Texans Take to Capitol, Demand Representatives Resist TSA Tyranny
* * * *
The below re-posted [from here]
2011 Montana Legislature
Additional Bill Links PDF (with line numbers)
HOUSE BILL NO. 382
INTRODUCED BY D. SKEES
A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT PROHIBITING INFRINGEMENT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO NULLIFICATION OF ANY FEDERAL STATUTE, MANDATE, OR EXECUTIVE ORDER CONSIDERED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE STATE; ENACTING THE MONTANA NULLIFICATION REAFFIRMATION ACT; AND PROVIDING A RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY DATE."
WHEREAS, the State of Montana has a compelling interest as a sovereign state of the United States of America in the proper implementation of protection and justice within its borders; and
WHEREAS, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees and reserves to the states or their people all powers not specifically granted to the federal government elsewhere in the Constitution as they were publicly understood at the time that the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, subject only to modification by duly ratified subsequent amendments to the United States Constitution. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and
WHEREAS, as a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the State and people of Montana that other than the enumerated powers expressly granted to the United States under Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution, Congress and the federal government will not exercise any purported additional control over or commandeer rights belonging to the State of Montana or its people; and
WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, the sole and sovereign power to regulate the state business and affairs rested in the state legislature and has always been a compelling state concern and central to state sovereignty. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. Further, the power to regulate commerce among the several states as delegated to Congress in Article I, section 8, clause 3, of the United States Constitution, as understood at the time of the founding, was meant to empower Congress to regulate the buying and selling of products made by others and sometimes land, associated finance and financial instruments, and navigation and other carriage across state jurisdictional lines. This power to regulate "commerce" does not include agriculture, manufacturing, mining, major crimes, or land use, nor does it include activities that merely "substantially affect" commerce; and
WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, the Commerce Clause was not meant or understood to authorize Congress or the federal judiciary to regulate the state courts in the matter of state substantive law or state judicial procedure. This meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, as they pertain to the validity of religious, sectarian, or foreign law as being controlling or influential precedent, has never been modified by any duly ratified amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and
WHEREAS, Article I, section 8, clause 18, of the United States Constitution, the Necessary and Proper Clause, is not a blank check that empowers the federal government to do anything it deems is necessary or proper. It is instead a limitation of power under the common-law doctrine of "principals and incidents," which allows Congress to exercise incidental powers. There are two main conditions required for something to be incidental and therefore "necessary and proper". The law or power exercised must be:
(1) directly applicable to the main, enumerated power--some would say that without it, the enumerated power would be impossible to exercise in current, common understanding; and
(2) "lesser" than the main power; and
WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, Article I, section 8, clause 1, the General Welfare Clause, did not empower the federal government with the ability to do anything it deems good. It is instead a general introduction explaining the exercise of the enumerated powers of Congress that are set forth in Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution. When James Madison was asked if this clause were a grant of power, he replied with "If not only the means but the objects are unlimited, the parchment [the Constitution] should be thrown into the fire at once." Thus, this clause is a limitation on the power of the federal government to act in the welfare of all when passing laws in pursuance of the powers delegated to the United States. And the Commerce Clause was not meant or understood to authorize Congress or the federal judiciary to establish religious, sectarian, or foreign statute or case law as controlling or influential precedent. This meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, as they pertain to controlling or influential legal authority, has never been modified by any duly ratified amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and
WHEREAS, accordingly, the Legislature knows and affirms that neither the Commerce Clause, the General Welfare Clause, nor the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution has ever been expanded, modified, or amended, and therefore the Legislature specifically rejects and denies any expanded authority that the federal government may attempt to enforce; and
WHEREAS, Congress and the federal government are denied the power to establish laws within the state that are repugnant and obtrusive to state law and to the people within the state and are restrained and confined in authority by the 18 clauses set forth in Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, Congress and the federal government are denied the power to bind the states under foreign statute or case law other than those provisions duly ratified by Congress as a treaty, so long as the treaty does not violate a state constitution or the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, no authority has ever been given to the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, or the Judicial Branch of the federal government to preempt state legislation; and
WHEREAS, [this act] serves as a notice and demand to the federal government to cease and desist all activities outside the scope of the federal government's constitutionally designated powers.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION. Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 5] may be cited as the "Montana Nullification Reaffirmation Act".
NEW SECTION. Section 2. Commission of recommendation. (1) The legislature shall appoint a commission of recommendation, consisting of 11 members. The commission is charged to recommend, propose, and call for an up or down vote of simple majority to nullify in its entirety a specific federal law or regulation that is outside the scope of the powers delegated by the people to the federal government in the United States constitution. The commission shall respond with its recommendation within 30 days of receiving the federal legislation for consideration.
(2) The commission of recommendation may take up and review all existing federal statutes, mandates, and executive orders for the purpose of determining the constitutionality of the statute, mandate, or order. The commission may recommend for nullification any existing federal statute, mandate, or executive order enacted prior to [the effective date of this act].
(3) Upon recommendation for nullification, the legislature shall vote on the matter within 60 days after the beginning of the next legislative session, regular or special, following the recommendation for nullification. During the time between the recommendation for nullification and the legislative vote on nullification, the issue in question remains out of force or effect until the legislative vote can be taken. The appropriate documentation reflecting the vote must be documented in the official records of the acts of the legislature maintained by the secretary of state.
NEW SECTION. Section 3. Effect of nullification. If the legislature votes by simple majority to nullify a federal statute, mandate, or executive order on the grounds of constitutionality, the state and its citizens may not recognize or be obligated to obey the nullified statute, mandate, or executive order.
NEW SECTION. Section 4. Prevention of enforcement of nullified federal laws -- duty of legislature -- jurisdiction. (1) The legislature shall enact all measures necessary to prevent the enforcement of federal laws or regulations nullified within the boundaries of this state.
(2) In a cause of action between this state and the federal government regarding nullification of federal legislation, a judicial mandate, or an executive order, the proper jurisdiction for these issues lies with the supreme court of the United States alone, as stated in Article III, section 2, of the United States constitution.
NEW SECTION. Section 5. Reservations of state's rights and powers. (1) Under the 10th amendment to the United States constitution, the people and state of Montana retain their exclusive power to regulate the state of Montana subject only to the 14th amendment's guarantee that the people and state of Montana shall exercise sovereign power in accordance with each citizen's lawful privileges or immunities and in compliance with the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law.
(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution secures and reserves to the people of Montana as against the federal government their natural rights to life, liberty, and property as entailed by the traditional Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty and as secured by state law, including but not limited to their rights as they were understood and secured by the law at the time that the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, as well as their rights as they were understood and secured by the law in the state of Montana at the time the Montana constitution was adopted in 1889. The guarantee of those rights is a matter of compact between the state and people of Montana and the United States at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889.
NEW SECTION. Section 6. Communication to the several states. (1) To ensure that this state continues in the same esteem and friendship as currently exists, the commission shall communicate to the legislatures of the several states the intentions of [this act] and the intention that this state considers union for specific national purposes, and particularly those enumerated in the United States constitution, to be friendly to the peace, happiness, and prosperity of all the states.
(2) A certified copy of [this act] must be sent to the president of the United States, the president of the United States senate, the speaker and clerk of the United States house of representatives, and each member of Montana's congressional delegation along with the request that [this act] be officially entered into the congressional record.
NEW SECTION. Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 5] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 2, chapter 1, and the provisions of Title 2, chapter 1, apply to [sections 1 through 5].
NEW SECTION. Section 8. Severability. If a part of [this act] is invalid, all valid parts that are severable from the invalid part remain in effect. If a part of [this act] is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.
NEW SECTION. Section 9. Retroactive applicability. [This act] applies retroactively, within the meaning of 1-2-109, to any federal statute, mandate, or executive order entered into before [the effective date of this act].
- END -
* * * *
Besides, not being made today, and Aaron Russo not having all of the endless facts straight, and not being able to predict the future 100%, does the Aaron Russo film below stand up to the time that has passed so far?
Aaron Russon admits to being part of the sleezebag elitist club. So please take all with a grain of salt, but also consider the content.
Reflections And Warnings - An Interview With Aaron Russo {Full Film}
Text with video:
* * * *
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2011/05/james-corbett-report-osama-bin-laden.html
-
"Federal Blockade"/ "Financial Terrorism"
Text with below video:
Uploaded by TheAlexJonesChannel on May 25, 2011
Texas Rep. David Simpson talks with Alex about the Department of Justice threat to cancel airline flights to and from Texas in response to HB 1937, a bill Simpson filed to defend travelers' dignity against offensive and intrusive groping searches of private parts without probable cause by the TSA. HB 1937 passed unanimously out of committee and then again out of the Texas House and is backed by members of both parties in Texas.
Tex Rep. David Simpson: DOJ Threatens to Cancel Airflights into Texas in Response to TSA Ban Bill
Alex Jones & Fellow Texans Take to Capitol, Demand Representatives Resist TSA Tyranny
* * * *
The below re-posted [from here]
2011 Montana Legislature
Additional Bill Links PDF (with line numbers)
HOUSE BILL NO. 382
INTRODUCED BY D. SKEES
A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT PROHIBITING INFRINGEMENT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO NULLIFICATION OF ANY FEDERAL STATUTE, MANDATE, OR EXECUTIVE ORDER CONSIDERED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE STATE; ENACTING THE MONTANA NULLIFICATION REAFFIRMATION ACT; AND PROVIDING A RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY DATE."
WHEREAS, the State of Montana has a compelling interest as a sovereign state of the United States of America in the proper implementation of protection and justice within its borders; and
WHEREAS, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees and reserves to the states or their people all powers not specifically granted to the federal government elsewhere in the Constitution as they were publicly understood at the time that the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, subject only to modification by duly ratified subsequent amendments to the United States Constitution. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and
WHEREAS, as a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the State and people of Montana that other than the enumerated powers expressly granted to the United States under Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution, Congress and the federal government will not exercise any purported additional control over or commandeer rights belonging to the State of Montana or its people; and
WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, the sole and sovereign power to regulate the state business and affairs rested in the state legislature and has always been a compelling state concern and central to state sovereignty. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. Further, the power to regulate commerce among the several states as delegated to Congress in Article I, section 8, clause 3, of the United States Constitution, as understood at the time of the founding, was meant to empower Congress to regulate the buying and selling of products made by others and sometimes land, associated finance and financial instruments, and navigation and other carriage across state jurisdictional lines. This power to regulate "commerce" does not include agriculture, manufacturing, mining, major crimes, or land use, nor does it include activities that merely "substantially affect" commerce; and
WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, the Commerce Clause was not meant or understood to authorize Congress or the federal judiciary to regulate the state courts in the matter of state substantive law or state judicial procedure. This meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, as they pertain to the validity of religious, sectarian, or foreign law as being controlling or influential precedent, has never been modified by any duly ratified amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and
WHEREAS, Article I, section 8, clause 18, of the United States Constitution, the Necessary and Proper Clause, is not a blank check that empowers the federal government to do anything it deems is necessary or proper. It is instead a limitation of power under the common-law doctrine of "principals and incidents," which allows Congress to exercise incidental powers. There are two main conditions required for something to be incidental and therefore "necessary and proper". The law or power exercised must be:
(1) directly applicable to the main, enumerated power--some would say that without it, the enumerated power would be impossible to exercise in current, common understanding; and
(2) "lesser" than the main power; and
WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, Article I, section 8, clause 1, the General Welfare Clause, did not empower the federal government with the ability to do anything it deems good. It is instead a general introduction explaining the exercise of the enumerated powers of Congress that are set forth in Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution. When James Madison was asked if this clause were a grant of power, he replied with "If not only the means but the objects are unlimited, the parchment [the Constitution] should be thrown into the fire at once." Thus, this clause is a limitation on the power of the federal government to act in the welfare of all when passing laws in pursuance of the powers delegated to the United States. And the Commerce Clause was not meant or understood to authorize Congress or the federal judiciary to establish religious, sectarian, or foreign statute or case law as controlling or influential precedent. This meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, as they pertain to controlling or influential legal authority, has never been modified by any duly ratified amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and
WHEREAS, accordingly, the Legislature knows and affirms that neither the Commerce Clause, the General Welfare Clause, nor the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution has ever been expanded, modified, or amended, and therefore the Legislature specifically rejects and denies any expanded authority that the federal government may attempt to enforce; and
WHEREAS, Congress and the federal government are denied the power to establish laws within the state that are repugnant and obtrusive to state law and to the people within the state and are restrained and confined in authority by the 18 clauses set forth in Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, Congress and the federal government are denied the power to bind the states under foreign statute or case law other than those provisions duly ratified by Congress as a treaty, so long as the treaty does not violate a state constitution or the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, no authority has ever been given to the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, or the Judicial Branch of the federal government to preempt state legislation; and
WHEREAS, [this act] serves as a notice and demand to the federal government to cease and desist all activities outside the scope of the federal government's constitutionally designated powers.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION. Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 5] may be cited as the "Montana Nullification Reaffirmation Act".
NEW SECTION. Section 2. Commission of recommendation. (1) The legislature shall appoint a commission of recommendation, consisting of 11 members. The commission is charged to recommend, propose, and call for an up or down vote of simple majority to nullify in its entirety a specific federal law or regulation that is outside the scope of the powers delegated by the people to the federal government in the United States constitution. The commission shall respond with its recommendation within 30 days of receiving the federal legislation for consideration.
(2) The commission of recommendation may take up and review all existing federal statutes, mandates, and executive orders for the purpose of determining the constitutionality of the statute, mandate, or order. The commission may recommend for nullification any existing federal statute, mandate, or executive order enacted prior to [the effective date of this act].
(3) Upon recommendation for nullification, the legislature shall vote on the matter within 60 days after the beginning of the next legislative session, regular or special, following the recommendation for nullification. During the time between the recommendation for nullification and the legislative vote on nullification, the issue in question remains out of force or effect until the legislative vote can be taken. The appropriate documentation reflecting the vote must be documented in the official records of the acts of the legislature maintained by the secretary of state.
NEW SECTION. Section 3. Effect of nullification. If the legislature votes by simple majority to nullify a federal statute, mandate, or executive order on the grounds of constitutionality, the state and its citizens may not recognize or be obligated to obey the nullified statute, mandate, or executive order.
NEW SECTION. Section 4. Prevention of enforcement of nullified federal laws -- duty of legislature -- jurisdiction. (1) The legislature shall enact all measures necessary to prevent the enforcement of federal laws or regulations nullified within the boundaries of this state.
(2) In a cause of action between this state and the federal government regarding nullification of federal legislation, a judicial mandate, or an executive order, the proper jurisdiction for these issues lies with the supreme court of the United States alone, as stated in Article III, section 2, of the United States constitution.
NEW SECTION. Section 5. Reservations of state's rights and powers. (1) Under the 10th amendment to the United States constitution, the people and state of Montana retain their exclusive power to regulate the state of Montana subject only to the 14th amendment's guarantee that the people and state of Montana shall exercise sovereign power in accordance with each citizen's lawful privileges or immunities and in compliance with the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law.
(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution secures and reserves to the people of Montana as against the federal government their natural rights to life, liberty, and property as entailed by the traditional Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty and as secured by state law, including but not limited to their rights as they were understood and secured by the law at the time that the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, as well as their rights as they were understood and secured by the law in the state of Montana at the time the Montana constitution was adopted in 1889. The guarantee of those rights is a matter of compact between the state and people of Montana and the United States at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889.
NEW SECTION. Section 6. Communication to the several states. (1) To ensure that this state continues in the same esteem and friendship as currently exists, the commission shall communicate to the legislatures of the several states the intentions of [this act] and the intention that this state considers union for specific national purposes, and particularly those enumerated in the United States constitution, to be friendly to the peace, happiness, and prosperity of all the states.
(2) A certified copy of [this act] must be sent to the president of the United States, the president of the United States senate, the speaker and clerk of the United States house of representatives, and each member of Montana's congressional delegation along with the request that [this act] be officially entered into the congressional record.
NEW SECTION. Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 5] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 2, chapter 1, and the provisions of Title 2, chapter 1, apply to [sections 1 through 5].
NEW SECTION. Section 8. Severability. If a part of [this act] is invalid, all valid parts that are severable from the invalid part remain in effect. If a part of [this act] is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.
NEW SECTION. Section 9. Retroactive applicability. [This act] applies retroactively, within the meaning of 1-2-109, to any federal statute, mandate, or executive order entered into before [the effective date of this act].
- END -
* * * *
Besides, not being made today, and Aaron Russo not having all of the endless facts straight, and not being able to predict the future 100%, does the Aaron Russo film below stand up to the time that has passed so far?
Aaron Russon admits to being part of the sleezebag elitist club. So please take all with a grain of salt, but also consider the content.
Reflections And Warnings - An Interview With Aaron Russo {Full Film}
Text with video:
Uploaded by rohstyles23 on Jun 1, 2009
BUY THE DVD AT: http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/reandwainwia.html
In an historic final interview, filmmaker and music promoter Aaron Russo goes in depth on the insider-knowledge given to him by a member of the Rockefeller family. Russo was told-- prior to 9/11-- of plans to stage terror attacks, invade foreign nations, and kickstart a high-tech police state control grid that would track the populations' every move with implantable RFID microchips.
This information-packed presentation is filled with never-before seen footage. Throughout the film, Alex Jones breaks down the latest activities of the New World Order and how it ties into what Russo predicted.
Aaron explains how the elite created the women's liberation movement to break up the family and tax working women. Russo breaks down the deception of democracy-- which is nothing more than mob rule guaranteed to produce tyranny.
Russo also exposes the IRS & Federal Reserve. He blasts the unconstitutional and predatory institutions that have crippled the American Republic and crushed the people with bogus taxes, inflation and loss of privacy. Russo explains that he himself was persecuted in the late 80s by a criminal 'retroactive' tax scheme that attempted to levy new taxes on years already passed.
As night falls on the Republic, Aaron Russo delivers a powerful call for the forces of liberty to rise and crush tyranny. Only then can the Republic be restored.
THIS DVD INCLUDES:
- Never-before seen behind the scenes footage
- An exclusive interview with Aaron about his life
- Aaron Russo radio interviews from the Alex Jones Show
* * * *
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2011/05/james-corbett-report-osama-bin-laden.html
-
posted by The_SRV at 4:57 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home