Thursday, March 28, 2013

Connecticut Police confiscating US Veterans Guns

Nothing new here, [this has all been reported on before]

Check out [Steven G. Erickson's channel]

Text with below video:

Streamed live on Mar 25, 2013
Check out SurviveAndThrive.TV for more information!

Get Paid To Prepare!

Join Me on Google Plus!

Contact G4T?
Email: george4title(AT)

Business Inquiry? Trip Schedule?
(760) 502-6278

urban survival

Coming Soon

From David:
My name is David A Schmecker. If possible I'd like to get my story known to as many people as possible.
To make this as brief as possible I live in
Connecticut and I'm 50 years old and I'm an honorably discharged
disabled NAVY veteran.. I don't have a psychiatric past or a
criminal past.
Feb 5th 2013 my veterans hospital primary care doctor called my
home and heard a message on my answering machine he said sounded
peculiar and the VA contacted the local police to perform a
wellness check. The police came to my home and without any
justification whatsoever, hauled me away for a psychiatric
evaluation to a local hospital. I submitted to their forceful
insistence under duress and fear of arrest or worse. I wasn't
arrested and no crime was committed nor any threats made to
myself or others. They confiscated my guns and pistol permit. I
was released two days later from the evaluation on my on
recognizance I have since attempted to use the courts and
attorneys to fight the revocation of my pistol permit Then on
top of everything else, the bills from the short stay at the
hospital and ems bills they billed me and what I had to pay the
attorney adds up to a large amount of money. I'm just a nobody
so there is obviously a campaign orchestrated to disarm law
abiding citizens and the Veterans Administration has found a
loophole in the system to do it. Because I'm a nobody they feel
empowered to be able to do this to me. I must be the tip of the
ice burg of this campaign and they are testing the waters to
see what they can get away with and with whom. They have messed
with my life and my rights. If I wasn't hurt I could just walk
away from the VA but I utilize their benefit for all of my
healthcare needs.. I am very concerned about where this country
is headed.

David's Contact Info:

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Nixon prolonged the Vietnam War to get elected?

The above picture and below text was cut and pasted from here.

The Lyndon Johnson tapes: Richard Nixon's 'treason'

Declassified tapes of President Lyndon Johnson's telephone calls provide a fresh insight into his world. Among the revelations - he planned a dramatic entry into the 1968 Democratic Convention to re-join the presidential race. And he caught Richard Nixon sabotaging the Vietnam peace talks... but said nothing.

After the Watergate scandal taught Richard Nixon the consequences of recording White House conversations none of his successors have dared to do it. But Nixon wasn't the first.

He got the idea from his predecessor Lyndon Johnson, who felt there was an obligation to allow historians to eventually eavesdrop on his presidency.

"They will provide history with the bark off," Johnson told his wife, Lady Bird.

The final batch of tapes released by the LBJ library covers 1968, and allows us to hear Johnson's private conversations as his Democratic Party tore itself apart over the question of Vietnam.

The 1968 convention, held in Chicago, was a complete shambles.

Tens of thousands of anti-war protesters clashed with Mayor Richard Daley's police, determined to force the party to reject Johnson's Vietnam war strategy.

As they taunted the police with cries of "The whole world is watching!" one man in particular was watching very closely.

Lyndon Baines Johnson was at his ranch in Texas, having announced five months earlier that he wouldn't seek a second term.

The president was appalled at the violence and although many of his staff sided with the students, and told the president the police were responsible for "disgusting abuse of police power," Johnson picked up the phone, ordered the dictabelt machine to start recording and congratulated Mayor Daley for his handling of the protest.

The president feared the convention delegates were about to reject his war policy and his chosen successor, Hubert Humphrey.

So he placed a series of calls to his staff at the convention to outline an astonishing plan. He planned to leave Texas and fly into Chicago.

He would then enter the convention and announce he was putting his name forward as a candidate for a second term.

It would have transformed the 1968 election. His advisers were sworn to secrecy and even Lady Bird did not know what her husband was considering.

On the White House tapes we learn that Johnson wanted to know from Daley how many delegates would support his candidacy. LBJ only wanted to get back into the race if Daley could guarantee the party would fall in line behind him.

They also discussed whether the president's helicopter, Marine One, could land on top of the Hilton Hotel to avoid the anti-war protesters.

Daley assured him enough delegates would support his nomination but the plan was shelved after the Secret Service warned the president they could not guarantee his safety.

The idea that Johnson might have been the candidate, and not Hubert Humphrey, is just one of the many secrets contained on the White House tapes.

They also shed light on a scandal that, if it had been known at the time, would have sunk the candidacy of Republican presidential nominee, Richard Nixon.

By the time of the election in November 1968, LBJ had evidence Nixon had sabotaged the Vietnam war peace talks - or, as he put it, that Nixon was guilty of treason and had "blood on his hands".

The BBC's former Washington correspondent Charles Wheeler learned of this in 1994 and conducted a series of interviews with key Johnson staff, such as defence secretary Clark Clifford, and national security adviser Walt Rostow.

But by the time the tapes were declassified in 2008 all the main protagonists had died, including Wheeler.

Now, for the first time, the whole story can be told.

It begins in the summer of 1968. Nixon feared a breakthrough at the Paris Peace talks designed to find a negotiated settlement to the Vietnam war, and he knew this would derail his campaign.

He therefore set up a clandestine back-channel involving Anna Chennault, a senior campaign adviser.

At a July meeting in Nixon's New York apartment, the South Vietnamese ambassador was told Chennault represented Nixon and spoke for the campaign. If any message needed to be passed to the South Vietnamese president, Nguyen Van Thieu, it would come via Chennault.

In late October 1968 there were major concessions from Hanoi which promised to allow meaningful talks to get underway in Paris - concessions that would justify Johnson calling for a complete bombing halt of North Vietnam. This was exactly what Nixon feared.

Chennault was despatched to the South Vietnamese embassy with a clear message: the South Vietnamese government should withdraw from the talks, refuse to deal with Johnson, and if Nixon was elected, they would get a much better deal.

So on the eve of his planned announcement of a halt to the bombing, Johnson learned the South Vietnamese were pulling out.

He was also told why. The FBI had bugged the ambassador's phone and a transcripts of Anna Chennault's calls were sent to the White House. In one conversation she tells the ambassador to "just hang on through election".

Johnson was told by Defence Secretary Clifford that the interference was illegal and threatened the chance for peace.

In a series of remarkable White House recordings we can hear Johnson's reaction to the news.

In one call to Senator Richard Russell he says: "We have found that our friend, the Republican nominee, our California friend, has been playing on the outskirts with our enemies and our friends both, he has been doing it through rather subterranean sources. Mrs Chennault is warning the South Vietnamese not to get pulled into this Johnson move."

He orders the Nixon campaign to be placed under FBI surveillance and demands to know if Nixon is personally involved.

When he became convinced it was being orchestrated by the Republican candidate, the president called Senator Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader in the Senate to get a message to Nixon.

The president knew what was going on, Nixon should back off and the subterfuge amounted to treason.

Publicly Nixon was suggesting he had no idea why the South Vietnamese withdrew from the talks. He even offered to travel to Saigon to get them back to the negotiating table.

Johnson felt it was the ultimate expression of political hypocrisy but in calls recorded with Clifford they express the fear that going public would require revealing the FBI were bugging the ambassador's phone and the National Security Agency (NSA) was intercepting his communications with Saigon.

So they decided to say nothing.

The president did let Humphrey know and gave him enough information to sink his opponent. But by then, a few days from the election, Humphrey had been told he had closed the gap with Nixon and would win the presidency. So Humphrey decided it would be too disruptive to the country to accuse the Republicans of treason, if the Democrats were going to win anyway.

Nixon ended his campaign by suggesting the administration war policy was in shambles. They couldn't even get the South Vietnamese to the negotiating table.

He won by less than 1% of the popular vote.

Once in office he escalated the war into Laos and Cambodia, with the loss of an additional 22,000 American lives, before finally settling for a peace agreement in 1973 that was within grasp in 1968.

The White House tapes, combined with Wheeler's interviews with key White House personnel, provide an unprecedented insight into how Johnson handled a series of crises that rocked his presidency. Sadly, we will never have that sort of insight again.

* * * *
* * * *

Steven G. Erickson's posts and video uploads on [found here

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

The French Revolution, Part 2?

The UN and Central Bankers seem to be racist and willing to kill non-whites the world over. Barack Obama might be a Black Face on one of the biggest genocidal attacks the world has ever seen. By baiting non-whites to attack whites, a race war could ensue worldwide. Wars benefit the Central Bankers and their UN agenda.

The globe is run by Corporate Royalty. International bankers and foreign corporations can have meetings in countries. At those meetings that country's constitution and laws are suspended. The bankers and corporate operatives are immune from prosecution as our their security forces. Citizens can not sue civilly, and the international criminals are immune from prosecution.

So, there are two world classes, us and them. They are less than 1/10 of 1%. Are we going to let them kill and enslave us willingly? Look at how corporations pay, or don't pay taxes, as compared to the individual. If the corporations pay less tax that means it is an unfair business competition. International corporations and banks will then own all land and run all business, as they co-opted government to make the people subsidize their own slavery.

Look at what happened to the small farmer in the United States of America, now part of the UN section, The North American Union. Small farmers paid more in taxes, corporations then took over farming and control. Corporations and their front, the UN, now own everything and are the world government. Are you going to let them bait you into fighting amongst ourselves?

Word search "CAFR". All governments that have been compromised have "set aside", "rainy day", "Special Pensions", and other accounts that are used for the elite, not you. These accounts have trillions of dollars of your money, no matter what citizen of what country you are. The elite live off the interest and use your money to attack you in your own home. Is that okay with you? Check out my channel.


Text with below video:

From "The Generation of National Identity"

- A Declaration of War

We are Generation Identitaire.

We are the generation who get killed for glancing at the wrong person,

for refusing someone a cigarette,

or having an "attitude" that annoys someone.

We are the generation of ethnic fracture,

total failure of coexistence,

and forced mixing of the races.

We are the generation doubly punished:

Condemned to pay into a social system

so generous with strangers it becomes

unsustainable for our own people.

Our generation are the victims of the May '68'ers

who wanted to liberate themselves

from tradition, from knowledge and authority in education.

But they only accomplished to

liberate themselves from their responsibilities.

We reject your history books to re-gather our memories.

We no longer believe that „Khader" could ever be our brother,

we have stopped believing in a „Global Village" and the „Family of Man".

We discovered that we have roots,

ancestry and therefore a future.

Our heritage is our land, our blood, our identity.

We are the heirs to our own future

We turned off the TV to march the streets.

We painted our slogans on the walls. Cried through loudspeakers

for "youth in power" and flew our Lambda flags high.

The Lambda, painted on proud Spartans' shields, is our symbol.

Don't you understand what this means ?

We will not back down, we will not give in.

We are sick and tired of your cowardice.

You are from the years of post-war prosperity,

retirement benefits, S.O.S Racism and

„diversity", sexual liberation and a bag of rice from Bernard Kouchner.

We are 25 percent unemployment,

social debt, multicultural collapse

and an explosion of anti-white racism.

We are broken families, and young French soldiers dying in Afghanistan.

You won't buy us with a condescending look,

a state-paid job of misery and a pat on the shoulder.

We don't need your youth-policies.

Youth IS our policy.

Don't think this is simply a manifesto.

It is a declaration of war.

You are of yesterday, we are of tomorrow.

* * * *

One of Steven G. Erickson's favorite blogs:


"Fight the AIPAC whores"

Steven G. Erickson's channel [click here]

Sunday, March 10, 2013

America's Operators have a Double Set of Books

"The US States with the strictest gun control laws are the states that are stealing the most from their citizens."

The elites have stolen your pension, your land, your future. They have stolen your net worth. They are out to break up your family and kill you. They have stolen enough from you, that you need not pay taxes for years and a legitimate government could operate on the interest on the money stolen from us for years. Here the blueprint for their crimes, it has only gotten worse ...

All is explained in the videos below.

Walter Burien Explains The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report on Alex Jones Tv 1/6

Text with video:

Uploaded on May 26, 2010
Alex also talks with Walter Burien, an advocate for government fiscal accountability and budgeting. Bubien's documentary, The Biggest Game in Town, exposes government theft behind Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports

Parts 2 thru 6, below:

The CAFR Swindle - The Biggest Game In Town

Text with video:

Published on Sep 3, 2012
Taxes are no longer necessary. This video exposes a deliberate and massive swindle that is perpetrated by every government agency from your local school district all the way up to the Federal government.

This is the second Version of this expose' on public finance. Similar to first version, but incorporating input from Walter Burien and Clint Richardson.
See their sites for much more info:

* * * *

More of this theme found on [Steven G. Erickson's channel]

Have the Central Banks and Big Pharma partnered to vaccinate the general populations to cause sterilization, compliance, sickness, and even death? Is the elite out to make us all prisoners, dying, or dead? [Post]

Wednesday, March 06, 2013

More Reasons ALL Judges in the US need to be Reigned in

The same cabal of judges in California who did in Richard I. Fine are probably the reason the Central Banks were able to bankrupt America. They bribed the judges. The judges the F'd America.

More information on the forest. [Videos, the problem, and the solution]

Text with below video:

Uploaded on Mar 22, 2011
Former U S Prosecutor Dr. Richard I Fine explains how citizens can disqualify a judge who is "on the take". All 435 California Superior Court Judges in L A County can be disqualified by citizens who have been involved in litigation against the County of L A in the last two decades. If you lost, you can "Null & Void" the Judges Order and have a new trial. If you paid money to the County you now have a chance to recover that money, according to Fine who describes how he has already disqualified five judges who have been "On the Take" To get copies of Richard Fine's documents go to And a copy of the Caperton vs. Massey Coal case where the Federalist papers are quoting John Adams can be found at this link:
to download the contact information.

Friday, March 01, 2013

When is crazy, beyond crazy? Putting Aspartame in Milk!

Aspartame is poison. Putting it in milk without putting it on the label is criminal.

Why are they adding radioactive fluoride to drinking water. BPA in plastics is poison. We the people should question what the elite in international corporations really want to do to us.

They seem to want to poison us, make us sick, make us sterile, and they seem out to kill us. GMO food is not safe. We should boycott any supermarkets that sell GM Salmon.

Frankenstein meat is not safe. Should we trust the EPA and the FDA when they more out to make the big international corporations richer while going after the little guy.

When the big guys poison us it seems that government and the mainstream corporate pirate media is out to cover it up and block free speech. It is time to fight back.

* * * *

The below was cut and pasted [from here]

Aspartame in Milk Without a Label? Big Dairy Petitions FDA For Approval

Activist Post

Two powerful dairy organizations, The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), are petitioning the Food and Drug Administration to allow aspartame and other artificial sweeteners to be added to milk and other dairy products without a label.

The FDA currently allows the dairy industry to use "nutritive sweeteners" including sugar and high fructose corn syrup in many of their products. Nutritive sweeteners are defined as sweeteners with calories.

This petition officially seeks to amend the standard of identification for milk, cream, and 17 other dairy products like yogurt, sweetened condensed milk, sour cream, and others to provide for the use of any "safe and suitable sweetener" on the market.

They claim that aspartame and other artificial sweeteners would promote healthy eating and is good for school children.

According to the FDA notice issued this week:

IDFA and NMPF state that the proposed amendments would promote more healthful eating practices and reduce childhood obesity by providing for lower-calorie flavored milk products. They state that lower-calorie flavored milk would particularly benefit school children who, according to IDFA and NMPF, are more inclined to drink flavored milk than unflavored milk at school.

Although the FDA considers aspartame to be a "safe and suitable" sweetener, a recent Yale University study appears to directly challenge the claim that aspartame would reduce obesity. In fact, the study concluded just the opposite, that artificial sweeteners actually contributed to obesity and Type 2 diabetes.

The IDFA and NMPF argue "that the proposed amendments to the milk standard of identity would promote honesty and fair dealing in the marketplace" yet they don't want changes to the labels on dairy products.

Accordingly, the petitioners state that milk flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners should be labeled as milk without further claims so that consumers can “more easily identify its overall nutritional value.

It's unclear how consumers can more easily identify the overall nutritional value of milk products that are flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners without labels.

Quoting Section 130.10 of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, the dairy giants claim a new label is not required because sugar is added to milk without labeling it, and "the modified food is not inferior in performance" and "'reduced calorie' (labels) are not attractive to children" so marketing as such is of no benefit or detriment.

The FDA has opened public comments until May 21 for anyone interested to "submit comments, data, and information concerning the need for, and the appropriateness of, amending the standard of identity for milk and the additional dairy standards."

To submit a formal comment or send data to the FDA concerning adding aspartame and other artificial sweeteners to milk products CLICK HERE.

* * * *
* * * *

Steven G. Erickson's comment posted to the FDA in the online form:

I consider Aspartame a poisonous chemical. I believe it should never be put in any milk or milk products. I believe that all ingredients in a product should be clearly displayed on the label. I believe that if Aspartame is allowed to be put in milk, or milk products, without it being listed as an ingredient, that any principals, officials, and any FDA officials should be prosecuted. Aspartame put in milk products would be a red flag. To me it would mean that Central Banks and Foreign Corporations have infiltrated the US Government. Please do not allow Aspartame in milk or milk products. It would be just another excuse for Americans to be "free" and "American" at the same time to be outside the US. 

stevengerickson AT

Steven G. Erickson's video uploads:

My comment tracking number: 1jx-83ys-xrmm
Agency: FDA
Document ID: FDA-2009-P-0147-0012

Vast Alien Underground Bases, Real or Well Written Hoax?

This blogger's video uploads [click here]. The video below was not uploaded by me.

Hit Counter