Monday, May 30, 2011

Will New Digital Currency be used to buy food?

Text with below video:

Uploaded by on May 29, 2011

Today we're joined by The Real Plato, a man who is currently on the world's first Bitcoin road trip. We discuss what Bitcoins are, how they work, how people can start using them, and what it's like doing a cross-country trip without spending a single piece of Federal Reserve funny money.

The World's First Bitcoin Road Trip

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Time to Dump the Federal Government

If the Government wants to grope 3 year old's genitals at airports, it is time to dump the federal government. It is bad enough they are ripping off our last dollar. It is bad enough they are using our tax dollars to send our jobs oversees. It is time to fire them. It is in the US Constitution that we may fire them all, isn't it?

"Federal Blockade"/ "Financial Terrorism"

Text with below video:

Uploaded by on May 25, 2011

Texas Rep. David Simpson talks with Alex about the Department of Justice threat to cancel airline flights to and from Texas in response to HB 1937, a bill Simpson filed to defend travelers' dignity against offensive and intrusive groping searches of private parts without probable cause by the TSA. HB 1937 passed unanimously out of committee and then again out of the Texas House and is backed by members of both parties in Texas.

Tex Rep. David Simpson: DOJ Threatens to Cancel Airflights into Texas in Response to TSA Ban Bill

Alex Jones & Fellow Texans Take to Capitol, Demand Representatives Resist TSA Tyranny

* * * *

The below re-posted [from here]

2011 Montana Legislature

Additional Bill Links PDF (with line numbers)




WHEREAS, the State of Montana has a compelling interest as a sovereign state of the United States of America in the proper implementation of protection and justice within its borders; and

WHEREAS, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees and reserves to the states or their people all powers not specifically granted to the federal government elsewhere in the Constitution as they were publicly understood at the time that the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, subject only to modification by duly ratified subsequent amendments to the United States Constitution. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and

WHEREAS, as a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the State and people of Montana that other than the enumerated powers expressly granted to the United States under Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution, Congress and the federal government will not exercise any purported additional control over or commandeer rights belonging to the State of Montana or its people; and

WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, the sole and sovereign power to regulate the state business and affairs rested in the state legislature and has always been a compelling state concern and central to state sovereignty. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. Further, the power to regulate commerce among the several states as delegated to Congress in Article I, section 8, clause 3, of the United States Constitution, as understood at the time of the founding, was meant to empower Congress to regulate the buying and selling of products made by others and sometimes land, associated finance and financial instruments, and navigation and other carriage across state jurisdictional lines. This power to regulate "commerce" does not include agriculture, manufacturing, mining, major crimes, or land use, nor does it include activities that merely "substantially affect" commerce; and

WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, the Commerce Clause was not meant or understood to authorize Congress or the federal judiciary to regulate the state courts in the matter of state substantive law or state judicial procedure. This meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, as they pertain to the validity of religious, sectarian, or foreign law as being controlling or influential precedent, has never been modified by any duly ratified amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and

WHEREAS, Article I, section 8, clause 18, of the United States Constitution, the Necessary and Proper Clause, is not a blank check that empowers the federal government to do anything it deems is necessary or proper. It is instead a limitation of power under the common-law doctrine of "principals and incidents," which allows Congress to exercise incidental powers. There are two main conditions required for something to be incidental and therefore "necessary and proper". The law or power exercised must be:

(1) directly applicable to the main, enumerated power--some would say that without it, the enumerated power would be impossible to exercise in current, common understanding; and

(2) "lesser" than the main power; and

WHEREAS, at the time the United States Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, Article I, section 8, clause 1, the General Welfare Clause, did not empower the federal government with the ability to do anything it deems good. It is instead a general introduction explaining the exercise of the enumerated powers of Congress that are set forth in Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution. When James Madison was asked if this clause were a grant of power, he replied with "If not only the means but the objects are unlimited, the parchment [the Constitution] should be thrown into the fire at once." Thus, this clause is a limitation on the power of the federal government to act in the welfare of all when passing laws in pursuance of the powers delegated to the United States. And the Commerce Clause was not meant or understood to authorize Congress or the federal judiciary to establish religious, sectarian, or foreign statute or case law as controlling or influential precedent. This meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, as they pertain to controlling or influential legal authority, has never been modified by any duly ratified amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the foregoing public meaning and understanding of Article I, section 8, the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, and the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution is a matter of compact between the State and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889; and

WHEREAS, accordingly, the Legislature knows and affirms that neither the Commerce Clause, the General Welfare Clause, nor the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution has ever been expanded, modified, or amended, and therefore the Legislature specifically rejects and denies any expanded authority that the federal government may attempt to enforce; and

WHEREAS, Congress and the federal government are denied the power to establish laws within the state that are repugnant and obtrusive to state law and to the people within the state and are restrained and confined in authority by the 18 clauses set forth in Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution; and

WHEREAS, Congress and the federal government are denied the power to bind the states under foreign statute or case law other than those provisions duly ratified by Congress as a treaty, so long as the treaty does not violate a state constitution or the United States Constitution; and

WHEREAS, no authority has ever been given to the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, or the Judicial Branch of the federal government to preempt state legislation; and

WHEREAS, [this act] serves as a notice and demand to the federal government to cease and desist all activities outside the scope of the federal government's constitutionally designated powers.


NEW SECTION. Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 5] may be cited as the "Montana Nullification Reaffirmation Act".

NEW SECTION. Section 2. Commission of recommendation. (1) The legislature shall appoint a commission of recommendation, consisting of 11 members. The commission is charged to recommend, propose, and call for an up or down vote of simple majority to nullify in its entirety a specific federal law or regulation that is outside the scope of the powers delegated by the people to the federal government in the United States constitution. The commission shall respond with its recommendation within 30 days of receiving the federal legislation for consideration.

(2) The commission of recommendation may take up and review all existing federal statutes, mandates, and executive orders for the purpose of determining the constitutionality of the statute, mandate, or order. The commission may recommend for nullification any existing federal statute, mandate, or executive order enacted prior to [the effective date of this act].

(3) Upon recommendation for nullification, the legislature shall vote on the matter within 60 days after the beginning of the next legislative session, regular or special, following the recommendation for nullification. During the time between the recommendation for nullification and the legislative vote on nullification, the issue in question remains out of force or effect until the legislative vote can be taken. The appropriate documentation reflecting the vote must be documented in the official records of the acts of the legislature maintained by the secretary of state.

NEW SECTION. Section 3. Effect of nullification. If the legislature votes by simple majority to nullify a federal statute, mandate, or executive order on the grounds of constitutionality, the state and its citizens may not recognize or be obligated to obey the nullified statute, mandate, or executive order.

NEW SECTION. Section 4. Prevention of enforcement of nullified federal laws -- duty of legislature -- jurisdiction. (1) The legislature shall enact all measures necessary to prevent the enforcement of federal laws or regulations nullified within the boundaries of this state.

(2) In a cause of action between this state and the federal government regarding nullification of federal legislation, a judicial mandate, or an executive order, the proper jurisdiction for these issues lies with the supreme court of the United States alone, as stated in Article III, section 2, of the United States constitution.

NEW SECTION. Section 5. Reservations of state's rights and powers. (1) Under the 10th amendment to the United States constitution, the people and state of Montana retain their exclusive power to regulate the state of Montana subject only to the 14th amendment's guarantee that the people and state of Montana shall exercise sovereign power in accordance with each citizen's lawful privileges or immunities and in compliance with the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law.

(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution secures and reserves to the people of Montana as against the federal government their natural rights to life, liberty, and property as entailed by the traditional Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty and as secured by state law, including but not limited to their rights as they were understood and secured by the law at the time that the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, as well as their rights as they were understood and secured by the law in the state of Montana at the time the Montana constitution was adopted in 1889. The guarantee of those rights is a matter of compact between the state and people of Montana and the United States at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889.

NEW SECTION. Section 6. Communication to the several states. (1) To ensure that this state continues in the same esteem and friendship as currently exists, the commission shall communicate to the legislatures of the several states the intentions of [this act] and the intention that this state considers union for specific national purposes, and particularly those enumerated in the United States constitution, to be friendly to the peace, happiness, and prosperity of all the states.

(2) A certified copy of [this act] must be sent to the president of the United States, the president of the United States senate, the speaker and clerk of the United States house of representatives, and each member of Montana's congressional delegation along with the request that [this act] be officially entered into the congressional record.

NEW SECTION. Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 5] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 2, chapter 1, and the provisions of Title 2, chapter 1, apply to [sections 1 through 5].

NEW SECTION. Section 8. Severability. If a part of [this act] is invalid, all valid parts that are severable from the invalid part remain in effect. If a part of [this act] is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.

NEW SECTION. Section 9. Retroactive applicability. [This act] applies retroactively, within the meaning of 1-2-109, to any federal statute, mandate, or executive order entered into before [the effective date of this act].

- END -

* * * *

Besides, not being made today, and Aaron Russo not having all of the endless facts straight, and not being able to predict the future 100%, does the Aaron Russo film below stand up to the time that has passed so far?

Aaron Russon admits to being part of the sleezebag elitist club. So please take all with a grain of salt, but also consider the content.

Reflections And Warnings - An Interview With Aaron Russo {Full Film}

Text with video:

Uploaded by on Jun 1, 2009

In an historic final interview, filmmaker and music promoter Aaron Russo goes in depth on the insider-knowledge given to him by a member of the Rockefeller family. Russo was told-- prior to 9/11-- of plans to stage terror attacks, invade foreign nations, and kickstart a high-tech police state control grid that would track the populations' every move with implantable RFID microchips.
This information-packed presentation is filled with never-before seen footage. Throughout the film, Alex Jones breaks down the latest activities of the New World Order and how it ties into what Russo predicted.
Aaron explains how the elite created the women's liberation movement to break up the family and tax working women. Russo breaks down the deception of democracy-- which is nothing more than mob rule guaranteed to produce tyranny.
Russo also exposes the IRS & Federal Reserve. He blasts the unconstitutional and predatory institutions that have crippled the American Republic and crushed the people with bogus taxes, inflation and loss of privacy. Russo explains that he himself was persecuted in the late 80s by a criminal 'retroactive' tax scheme that attempted to levy new taxes on years already passed.
As night falls on the Republic, Aaron Russo delivers a powerful call for the forces of liberty to rise and crush tyranny. Only then can the Republic be restored.
- Never-before seen behind the scenes footage
- An exclusive interview with Aaron about his life
- Aaron Russo radio interviews from the Alex Jones Show

* * * *


Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Calvin, the biting dog, takes his last ride ...


I met Calvin when he was puppy with his mother. He was alpha all the way. I didn't let him get alpha with me. He bit one time to many.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Scary Science?

Disclaimer: Just because I post something doesn't mean that I agree, nor disagree, it just means that I find a subject interesting for debate. I can't vouch for all authors in this post, or whether they are telling the truth, or not. I believe Kathleen Dickson, Randy Sykes, and others are victims out of an out control system.

Text with below video:

Uploaded by on Oct 31, 2010


The Skippy on Lyme Disease Fraud

Text with video:

Uploaded by on Nov 12, 2006

Connecticut Officials and/or Yale University are allegedly involved in one of the biggest scams ever, involving Big Pharma, Corporate Fraud, racketeering, obstruction of justice, and running a state like a Mafia organization. A State and corporations should not be able to operate as a syndicate defrauding citizens and the world. The numbers tell the story. Kathleen Dickson shows the Patent numbers, the dates, and the percentages for accurate testing of Lyme Disease. Someone would have to disprove the math and all the claims that have documents to disprove her case. There is no personal attack or conflict of personalities when "just the facts ma'am" are produced. Applaud a woman sick with Lyme, a former research scientist at Pfizer for having the courage to speak out. She tool LymeRix off the market after testifying in front of the FDA. She has been retaliated against as a whistleblower ever since. You now have the facts, pass them on to others, let law enforcement know that you expect them to go after the bad guys.

Kathleen Dickson is not untypical of a person who has been completely fucked over by the system. She has been financially ripped off, might now be unemployable, has had her family ripped from her arms, and has wrongly been placed in a mental institution and prison after suffering judicial misconduct in the State of Connecticut. Her core argument:

* * * *

This blogger has met and talked to Randy Sykes, a Lyme Disease, Fraud in testing and treatment, reform advocate. Sykes is a subject in the below video. Are there bio-weapons and mass murder threats still being manufactured below Lyme, Connecticut, and New York City, on Plum Island? Is US Homeland Security about illegal detention, torture, mass murder, Germ Warfare, Operation Paperclip, causing pandemics, and abuse of citizens, not actually an agency to protect taxpayers using tax dollars? The Connecticut State Police Intelligence Unit and the Department of Administrative Services allegedly have a "Garden of Death", to grow plants that cause heart attacks, blindness, kidney failure, madness, aggression, memory loss, slow painful death and other maladies, is Lyme Disease and West Nile Virus just another weapon in their and the US national abuse citizens, arsenal?

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura: "Plum Island" (FULL LENGTH)

Text with video:

Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2010

*** FULL LENGTH 44 MINUTE EPISODE *** (Season 2, Episode 1)

"Plum Island":

Jesse storms Congress to find out if the government is conducting dangerous experiments at the Plum Island Animal Research Center off the coast of Long Island. The center, which began as a bio-warfare lab run by former Nazi scientists, has been blamed for spreading diseases and viruses throughout the mainland, including African swine flu and Lyme disease. Some suspect the mysterious Montauk Monster emanated from the facility.

* * * *
* * * *

Related Links:

* * * *
* * * *

The below re-posted [from here]

Plum Island, Lyme Disease
And Operation Paperclip -
A Deadly Triangle
From Patricia Doyle, PhD

Hello, Jeff - This is an excellent historical documentation of Plum Island's history even before it became the USDA Plum Island. The history goes back to operation paperclip and to PROVEN tick research on Plum Island dating back to the 1950s. Plum Island also worked with lone star ticks. ...I wondered how lone star ticks from Texas would get to my backyard in NY. The ticks had some help, i.e. germ scientists...and Plum Island.

Patricia Doyle


Plum Island, Lyme Disease and the Erich Traub File
(One 30-minute segment)
(Sources are noted in parentheses.)
(Recorded on 10/3/2004.)

Note: FTR#'s 260-316, 317, 324, FTR#325 and succeeding programs are streaming on Real Audio at FTR#'s 01-270, 316-324 are available for download only, also on Real Audio, on their Archive Page.)

Note: Users of this web site are emphatically encouraged to create a word document out of the program descriptions and do a "search" on individual subjects in order to more completely reference those items.

Note: Users of this web site (as well as the two WFMU web addresses noted above) are emphatically encouraged to use the internet to disseminate as much of the audio and printed material as possible. It is all FREE!

Note: It is recommended that listeners print the program descriptions for optimum readability. It is emphatically encouraged that listeners use the printed files on the Spitfire web site and the audio files on the WFMU web sites to create their own research/teaching databases.

Summary of FTR#480-(Note: The massive volume of "For The Record" programs about 9/11 and related topics is summarized and analyzed in the periodically-updated description for FTR#391. FTR#'s 454, 455, 456 are compilations of much of the key documentation culled from Mr. Emory's investigation into 9/11. Along with FTR#391, they should give listeners/readers a substantive grasp of this momentous event. It is recommended that listeners use this description and e-mail it to others. Also: The book "Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile" is available at About Paul Manning. In addition, the professional history of the late Paul Manning, the book's author, is presented in the description About Paul Manning. This enables listeners to acquaint others with Mr. Manning's journalistic credentials. Key material from the book is synopsized in an extended description for FTR#305. Understanding the Bormann organization is essential to comprehending the concept of "the Underground Reich." Note also that U.S. Government documents proving Prescott Bush Sr.'s Money-Laundering on behalf of the Third Reich before and after World War II are available at a linked website, along with commentary by John Buchanan, who located the documentation. This material is discussed in FTR#435. The website containing the documents is .) In the mid-1970's Lyme Disease broke out in Connecticut and it has since spread through much of the United States. This program examines the possibility that Lyme Disease may have spread as a result of clandestine experimentation on biological warfare on Plum Island-a Department of Agriculture facility that doubled as an Army BW research facility. Dedicated to the study of animal diseases, Plum Island appears to have been the site of experiments with disease-infected ticks conducted by Nazi scientists brought into the United States under Project Paperclip. One of the Nazi scientists who appears to have been involved with Plum Island was Dr. Erich Traub, who was in charge of the Third Reich's virological and bacteriological warfare program in World War II. Was Traub involved with experiments that led to the spread of Lyme Disease?

Program Highlights Include: Examination of Traub's studies in the US prior to World War II; Traub's pro-Nazi activities inside the US before the war; John Loftus' discovery of references in the National Archives to Nazi scientists experimenting with diseased ticks on Plum Island; Lyme Disease activist Steven Nostrum's discovery of Loftus' findings and his work investigating Plum Island; Details of Traub's involvement with Plum Island; files about Tick Research and Erich Traub that have been purged; Scientific American's dismissal of the Plum Island/Traub/Paperclip/Lyme Disease link; the Nazi heritage of the Von Holtzbrinck firm-which owns Scientific American; Plum Island experimentation with the disease-carrying "Lone Star Tick"; the fact that the Lone Star Tick-native to Texas-has somehow spread to New York, New Jersey and Connecticut!

1. In order to understand how Erich Traub came to the United States, it is important to understand Project PAPERCLIP. The program begins with a synoptic account of that project and how its prosecution led to Traub's entry to the United States and his involvement with Plum Island: "Nearing the end of World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union raced to recruit German scientists for postwar purposes. Under a top-secret program code-named Project PAPERCLIP, the U.S. military pursued Nazi scientific talent 'like forbidden fruit,' bringing them to America under employment contracts and offering them full U.S. citizenship. The recruits were supposed to be nominal participants in Nazi activities. But the zealous military recruited more than two thousand scientists, many of whom had dark Nazi party pasts." (Lab 257: the Disturbing Story of the Government's Secret Plum Island Germ Laboratory; by Michael Christopher Carroll; Copyright 2004 by Michael Christopher Carroll; HarperCollins [HC]; p. 7.)

2. "American scientists viewed these Germans as peers, and quickly forgot they were on opposite sides of a ghastly global war in which millions perished. Fearing brutal retaliation from the Soviets for the Nazis' vicious treatment of them, some scientists cooperated with the Americans to earn amnesty. Others played the two nations off each other to get the best financial deal in exchange for their services. Dr. Erich Traub was troubling on the Soviet side of the Iron Curtain after the war, and ordered to research germ warfare viruses for the Russians. He pulled off a daring escape with his family to West Berlin in 1949. Applying for Project Paperclip employment, Traub affirmed he wanted to 'do scientific work in the U.S.A., become an American citizen, and be protected from Russian reprisals.'" (Idem.)

3. The program sets forth Traub's work for the Third Reich: "As lab chief of Insel Riems-a secret Nazi biological warfare laboratory on a crescent-shaped island nestled in the Baltic Sea-Traub worked directly for Adolf Hitler's second-in-charge, SS Reichsfuehrer Heinrich Himmler, on live germ trials. . . ." (Ibid.; pp. 7-8.)

4. Traub had studied in the United States before the war (at the Rockefeller Institute) and had been involved in Nazi activities inside the U.S. prior to 1939 (the outbreak of World War II). " . . . Traub also listed his 1930's membership in Amerika-Deutscher Volksbund, a German-American 'club' also known as Camp Sigfriend. Just thirty miles west of Plum Island in Yaphank, Long Island, Camp Sigfried was the national headquarters of the American Nazi movement. . . .Ironically, Traub spent the prewar period of his scientific career on a fellowship at the Rockefeller Institute in Princeton, New Jersey, perfecting his skills in viruses and bacteria under the tutelage of American experts before returning to Nazi Germany on the eve of war. Despite Traub's troubling war record, the U.S. Navy recruited him for its scientific designs, and stationed him at the Naval Medical Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland." (Ibid.; p. 8.)

5. Nominally under the jurisdiction of the USDA (Department of Agriculture), Plum Island was also used for military biological warfare research on animal diseases. In that regard, it was involved with Fort Dietrick, the Army's top chemical and biological warfare facility. Note that Traub was at the foundation of the Plum Island/biological warfare nexus. "Just months into his PAPERCLIP contract, the germ warriors of Fort Detrick, the Army's biological warfare headquarters, in Frederick, Maryland, and CIA operatives invited Traub in for a talk, later reported in a declassified top-secret summary: Dr. Traub is a noted authority on viruses and diseases in Germany and Europe. This interrogation revealed much information of value to the animal disease program from a Biological Warfare point of view. Dr. Traub discussed work done at a German animal disease station during World War II and subsequent to the war when the station was under Russian control.' Traub's detailed explanation of the secret operation on Insel Riems, and his activities there during the war and for the Soviets, laid the ground work for Fort Detrick's offshore germ warfare animal diseased lab on Plum Island. Traub was a founding father. . . ." (Ibid.; pp. 8-9.)

6. It is interesting to note that the Third Reich's biological warfare program had the cover name of "Cancer Research Program." (In RFA#16-available from Spitfire-as well as FTR#'s 16, 73, we look at the National Cancer Institute's Special Viral Cancer Research Program and the evidence suggesting that the project was actually a front for the continuation of biological warfare research. Erich Traub appears to have been involved with the projects related to the SVCRP.) " . . . Everybody seemed willing to forget about Erich Traub's dirty past-that he played a crucial role in the Nazis' 'Cancer Research Program,' the cover name for their biological warfare program, and that he worked directly under SS Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler. They seemed willing to overlook that Traub in the 1930's faithfully attended Camp Sigfried. In fact, the USDA liked him so much, it glossed over his dubious past and offered him the top scientist job at the new Plum Island Laboratory-not once, but twice. Just months after the 1952 public hearings on selecting Plum Island, Doc Shahan dialed Dr. Traub at the naval laboratory to discuss plans for establishing the germ laboratory and a position on Plum Island." (Ibid.; p. 10.)

7. More about how Traub came to be in a significant position at Plum Island. "Six years later-and only two years after Traub squirmed in his seat at the Plum Island dedication ceremonies-senior scientist Dr. Jacob Traum retired. The USDA needed someone of 'outstanding caliber, with a long established reputation, internationally as well as nationally,' to fill Dr. Traum's shoes. But somehow it couldn't find a suitable American. 'As a last resort it is now proposed that a foreigner be employed.' The aggies' choice? Erich Traub, who was in their view 'the most desirable candidate from any source.' The 1958 secret USDA memorandum 'Justification for Employment of Dr. Erich Traub' conveniently omitted his World War II activities; but it did emphasize that 'his originality, scientific abilities, and general competence as an investigator' were developed at the Rockefeller Institute in New Jersey in the 1930's." (Idem.)

8. The push to employ Traub as the director of Plum Island involved professional recommendations that omitted his work for the Third Reich: "The letters supporting Traub to lead Plum Island came in from fellow Plum Island founders. 'I hope that every effort will be made to get him. He has had long and productive experience in both prewar and postwar Germany,' said Dr. William Hagan, dean of the Cornell University veterinary school, carefully dispensing with his wartime activities. The final word came from his dear American friend and old Rockefeller Institute boss Dr. Richard Shope, who described Traub as 'careful, skill, productive and very original' and 'one of this world's most outstanding virologists.' Shope's sole reference to Traub at war: 'During the war he was in Germany serving in the German Army.'" (Idem.)

9. Traub declined the offer to lead the lab. There is considerable evidence that he was involved with biological warfare research at Plum Island. "Declining the USDA's offer, Traub continued his directorship of the Tubingen laboratory in West Germany, though he visited Plum Island frequently. In 1960, he was forced to resign as Tubingen's director under a dark cloud of financial embezzlement. Traub continued sporadic lab research for another three years, and then left Tubingen for good--a scandalous end to a checkered career. In the late 1970's, the esteemed virologist Dr. Robert Shope, on business in Munich, paid his father Richard's old Rockefeller Institute disciple a visit. The germ warrior had been in early retirement for about a decade by then. 'I had dinner with Traub one day-out of old time's sake-and he was a pretty defeated man by then.' On May 18, 1985, the Nazis' virus warrior Dr. Erich Traub died unexpectedly in his sleep in West Germany. He was seventy-eight years old." (Ibid.; pp. 10-11.)

10. "A biological warfare mercenary who worked under three flags-Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and the UnitedStates-Traub was never investigated for war crimes. He escaped any inquiry into his wartime past. The full extent of his sordid endeavors went with him to his grave. While America brought a handful of Nazi war criminals to justice, it safeguarded many others in exchange for verses to the new state religion-modern science and espionage. Records detailing a fraction of Eric Traub's activities are now available to the public, but most are withheld by Army intelligence and the CIA on grounds of national security. But there's enough of a glimpse to draw quite a sketch." (Ibid.; p. 11.)

11. An important chapter in the story of how the inquiry into the possible link between Plum Island, Erich Traub's work on behalf of the US and the spread of Lyme Disease concerns the work of former Justice Department prosecutor John Loftus. In his book The Belarus Secret, Loftus referred to work done on Plum Island in the early 1950's in which Nazi scientists were experimenting on diseased ticks. Might that have referred to Traub?! " . . . Attorney John Loftus was hired in 1979 by the Office of Special Investigations, a unit set up by the Justice Department to expose Nazi war crimes and unearth Nazis hiding in the United States. Given top-secret clearance to review files that had been sealed for thirty-five years, Loftus found a treasure trove of information on America's postwar Nazi recruiting. In 1982, publicly challenging the government's complacency with the wrongdoing, he told 60 minutes that top Nazi officers had been protected and harbored in America by the CIA and the State Department. 'They got the Emmy Award,' Loftus wrote. 'My family got the death threats.'" (Ibid.; p. 13.)

12. "Old spies reached out to him after the publication of his book, The Belarus Secret, encouraged that he-unlike other authors-submitted his manuscript to the government, agreeing to censor portions to protect national security. The spooks gave him copies of secret documents and told him stories of clandestine operations. From these leads, Loftus ferreted out the dubious Nazi past of Austrian president and U.N. secretary general Kurt Waldheim. Loftus revealed that during World War II, Waldheim had been an officer in a German Army unit that committed atrocities in Yugoslavia. A disgraced Kurt Waldheim faded from the international scene soon thereafter." (Idem.)

13. "In the preface of The Belarus Secret, Loftus laid out a striking piece of information gleaned from his spy network: 'Even more disturbing are the records of the Nazi germ warfare scientists who came to America. They experimented with poison ticks dropped from planes to spread rare diseases. I have received some information suggesting that the U.S. tested some of these poison ticks on the Plum Island artillery range off the coast of Connecticut during the early 1950's. . . .Most of the germ warfare records have been shredded, but there is a top secret U.S. document confirming that 'clandestine attacks on crops and animals' took place at this time." (Idem.)

14. More pieces of evidence on the tantalizing trail of evidence pointing to a possible Plum Island/Traub/Lyme disease link: "Erich Traub had been working for the American biological warfare program from his 1949 Soviet escape until 1953. We know he consulted with Fort Dietrick scientists and CIA operatives; that he worked for the USDA for a brief stint; and that he spoke regularly with Plum Island director Doc Shahan in 1952. Traub can be physically placed on Plum Island at least three times-on dedication day in 1956 and two visits, once in 1957 and again in the spring of 1958. Shahan, who enforced an ultrastrict policy against outside visitors, each time received special clearance from the State Department to allow Traub on Plum Island soil." (Ibid.; p. 14.)

15. If in fact Traub was involved with research on Plum Island, this development would have been consistent with programs being conducted at that time involving experimentation on unwitting American citizens with biological and chemical warfare research agents: "Research unearthed three USDA files from the vault of the National Archives-two were labeled TICK RESEARCH and a third E.TRAUB. All three folders were empty. The caked-on dust confirms the file boxes hadn't been open since the moment before they were taped shut in the 1950's. Preposterous as it sounds, clandestine outdoor germ warfare trials were almost routine during this period. In 1952, the Joint Chiefs of Staff called for a 'vigorous, well-planned, large-scale [biological warfare] test to the secretary of defense later that year stated, 'Steps should be take to make certain of adequate facilities are available, including those at Fort Detrick, Dugway Proving Ground, Fort Terry (Plum Island) and an island field testing area.' Was Plum Island the island field testing area? Indeed, when the Army first scouted Plum Island for its Cold War designs, they charted wind speeds and direction and found that, much to their liking, the prevailing winds blew out to sea." (Idem.)

16. "One of the participating 'interested agencies' was the USDA, which admittedly set up large plots of land throughout the Midwest for airborne anticrop germ spray tests. Fort Detrick's Special Operations Division ran 'vulnerability tests' in which operatives walked around Washington, D.C., and San Francisco with suitcases holding Serratia marcescens-a bacteria recommended to Fort Detrick by Traub's nominal supervisor, Nazi germ czar and Nuremberg defendant Dr. Kurt Blome. Tiny perforations allowed the germs' release so they could trace the flow of the germs through airports and bus terminals. Shortly thereafter, eleven elderly men and women checked into hospitals with never-before-seen Serratia marcescens infections. One patient died. Decades later when the germ tests were disclosed, the Army denied responsibility. . . . In the summer of 1966, Special Operations men walked into three New York City subway stations and tossed lightbulbs filled Bacillus subtilis, a benign bacteria, onto the tracks. The subway trains pushed the germs through the entire system and theoretically killed over a million passengers." (Idem.)

17. "Tests were also run with live, virulent, anti-animal germ agents. Two hog-cholera bombs were exploded at an altitude of 1,500 feet over pigpens set up at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida. And turkey feathers laced with Newcastle disease virus were dropped on animals grazing on a University of Wisconsin farm." (Ibid.; p. 15.)

18. "The Army never fully withdrew its germ warfare efforts against food animals. Two years after the Army gave Plum Island to the USDA-and three years after it told President Eisenhower it had ended all biological warfare against food animals-the Joint Chiefs advised that 'research on anti-animal agent-munition combinations should' continue, as well as 'field testing of anti-food agent munition combinations. . . .' In November 1957, military intelligence examined the elimination of the food supply of the Sino-Soviet Bloc, right down to the calories required for victory: 'In order to have a crippling effect on the economy of the USSR, the food and animal crop resources of the USSR would have to be damaged within a single growing season to the extent necessary to reduce the present average daily caloric intake from 2,800 calories to 1,400 calories; i.e., the starvation level. Reduction of food resources to this level, if maintained for twelve months, would produce 20 percent fatalities, and would decrease manual labor performance by 95 percent and clerical and light labor performance by 80 percent.' At least six outdoor stockyard tests occurred in 1964-65. Simulants were sprayed into stockyards in Fort Worth, Kansas City, St. Paul, Sioux Falls, and Omaha in tests determining how much foot-and-mouth disease virus would be required to destroy the food supply." (Idem.)

19. "Had the Army commandeered Plum Island for an outdoor trial? Maybe the USDA lent a hand with the trial, as it had done out west by furnishing the large test fields. After all, the Plum Island agreement between the Army and the USDA allowed the Army to borrow the island from the USDA when necessary and in the national interest." (Idem.)

20. A former employee at Plum Island in the 1950's has personal recollection of a "Nazi scientist" releasing ticks outdoors on Plum Island. "Traub might have monitored the tests. A source who worked on Plum Island in the 1950's recalls that animal handlers and a scientist released ticks outdoors on the island. 'They called him the Nazi scientist, when they came in, in 1951-they were inoculating these ticks,' and a picture he once saw 'shows the animal handler pointing to the area on Plum where they released the ticks.' Dr. Traub's World War II handiwork consisted of aerial virus sprays developed on Insel Riems and tested over occupied Russia, and of field work for Heinrich Himmler in Turkey. Indeed, his colleagues conducted bug trials by dropping live beetles from planes. An outdoor tick trial would have been de rigueur for Erich Traub." (Ibid.; pp. 15-16.)

21. Next, the program sets forth the case of Steve Nostrum-an early Lyme Disease victim whose reading of Loftus' book spurred him to begin inquiring about the Plum Island/Traub connection. "Somebody gave Steve Nostrum a copy of John Loftus's The Belarus Secret at one of his support group meetings. Steve had long suspected that Plum Island played a role in the evolution of Lyme disease, given the nature of its business and its proximity to Old Lyme, Connecticut. But he never publicly voiced the hunch, fearing a loss of credibility; hard facts and statistics earned him a reputation as a leader in the Lyme disease field. Now in his hands, he had a book written by a Justice Department attorney who not only had appeared on 60 Minutes but also had brought down the secretary general of the United Nations. Nostrum disclosed the possible Plum-Lyme connection on his own television show. He invited local news reporter and Plum Island ombudsman Karl Grossman to help him explore the possibilities in light of the island's biological mishaps. Asked why he wrote about Loftus's book in his weekly newspaper column, Grossman says, 'To let the theory rise or fall. To let the public consider it. And it seemed to me that the author was a Nazi hunter and a reputable attorney-this was not trivial information provided [and it was provided] by some reliable person.'" (Idem.)

22. "In October 1995, Nostrum, fresh off nursing duty (having earned an RN degree to help Lyme disease patients), rushed to a rare public meeting held by the USDA. In a white nurse's coat, stethoscope still around his neck, Nostrum rose. Trembling, his blond beard now streaked with gray, he clutched his copy of The Belarus Secret as he read the damning passage out loud for the USDA and the public to hear. 'I don't know whether this is true,' he said, looking at the dais. 'If it is true, there must be an investigation-if it's not true, then John Loftus needs to be prosecuted.' People in the audience clapped, and some were astonished. A few gawked, thinking he was nuts. How did the official USDA officials react? 'If stares could kill, I would have been dead,' remembers Nostrum." (Idem.)

23. "Hiding behind the same aloof veil of secrecy they had employed for decades, the USDA brazenly cut him off. 'There are those who think that little green men are hiding out there,' the officials responded to Nostrum. 'But trust us when we say there are no space aliens and no five-legged cows.' A few laughs erupted in the crowd. 'It did nothing but detract from what I was saying,' says Nostrum. 'But I said it, and I had the documentation to support it.'" (Idem.)

24. The author speculates about the deer and birds that visited Plum Island, and the possibility that some of the infected ticks may well have traveled to the mainland from the island on those vectors. (Carroll explains that white-tailed deer regularly swim the two miles to the island to forage and migrating birds stop on Plum Island on their way North and South during their annual migrations.) " . . . If Dr. Traub continued his outdoor germ experiments with the Army and experimented with ticks outdoors, the ticks would have made contact with mice, deer, and more than 140 species of wild birds known to frequent and nest on Plum Island. The birds spread their toxic cargo to resting and nesting perches atop the great elms and oaks of Old Lyme and elsewhere, just like they spread the West Nile virus throughout the United States." (Ibid.; p. 21.)

25. After noting that allegations of the discovery of Bb (the bacterium that causes Lyme Disease) in the late 1940's coincides with Traub's arrival on the island, the broadcast sets forth the denials by a USDA spokesperson that there was any BW/Traub/Plum Island link to the spread of the Lyme infection. Note that Scientific American dismissed the possibility of a "Nazi scientist" link to Plum Island. In FTR#240-part of the long FTR series about "German Corporate Control over American Media"--it was noted that the Von Holtzbrinck firm controls that magazine. Like its larger competitor Bertelsmann, the Von Holtzbrinck firm is rooted firmly in the Third Reich. In FTR#226, we examined the Nazi heritage of Von Holtzbrinck and the possibility that they may employed the notorious SS officer and Goebbels protégé Werner Naumann. The possibility that the Von Holtzbrinck/Scientific American link may have had something to do with the magazine's casual dismissal of the Traub/Plum/Lyme link is not one to be too readily dismissed. "Researchers trying to prove that Lyme disease existed before 1975 claim to have isolated Bb [the bacterium that causes the infection] in ticks collected on nearby Shelter Island and Long Island in the late 1940's. That timing coincides with both Erich Traub's arrival in the United States on Project PAPERCLIP and the Army's selection of Plum Island as its offshore biological warfare laboratory. The USDA's spokesperson, Sandy Miller Hays, is unconvinced about the possibility of a link between Lyme disease and Plum Island: . . . A PR expert, Hays had Scientific American eating out of her hand in June 2000, when they reported her as saying, ' 'We still get asked about the Nazi scientists,' . . . [with] the slightest trace of weariness creeping into her voice.' In their feature story on Plum Island, the prestigious magazine dubbed the intrigue surrounding the island as a 'fanciful fictional tapestry.'" (Ibid.; pp. 21-22.)

26. The program concludes with examination of Plum Island's work with the "Lone Star Tick"-native to Texas. The focal point of experimentation on Plum Island in the 1970's, the Lone Star tick-like Lyme Disease--is now spread throughout New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. How did that happen? " . . . The lab chief [Dr. Charles Mebus] failed to mention that Plum Island also worked on 'hard ticks,' a crucial distinction. A long overlooked document, obtained from the files of an investigation by the office of former Long Island Congressman Thomas Downey, sheds new light on the second, more damning connection to Lyme disease. A USDA 1978 internal research document titled 'African Swine Fever' notes that in 1975 and 1976, contemporaneous with the strange outbreak in Old Lyme, Connecticut, 'the adult and nymphal stages of Abylomma americanum and Abylomma cajunense were found to be incapable of harboring and transmitting African swine fever virus.' In laymen's terms, Plum Island was experimenting with the Lone Star tick and the Cayenne tick-feeding them on viruses and testing them on pigs-during the ground zero year of Lyme disease. They did not transmit African swine fever to pigs, said the document, but they might have transmitted Bb to researchers or to the island's vectors. The Lone Star tick, named after the white star on the back of the female, is a hard tick; along with its cousin, the deer tick, it is a culprit in the spread of Lyme disease. Interestingly, at that time, the Lone Star tick's habitat was confined to Texas. Today, however, it is endemic throughout New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey. And no one can really explain how it migrated all the way from Texas. . . ." (Ibid.; pp. 24-25.)

* * * *

[click here] for:

Conspiracy Theorist Version of Crop Circles and Cattle Mutilations


Breaking the Law, Growing Your Own Food, Raising Chickens

Should you be forced to be further raped by bankster corporations having to pay for, and eat, questionable food? Should you be forced to eat corporate genetically modified food which may harm you, and the planet? Should Monsanto and other corporations own you as their slave? Well, the biggest protest to maybe get mass appeal is to grow your own food. Have you fucked over your government today by actually having a mind of your own? Well, not mindlessly watching Fox, CNN, and MSNBC to hear what the corporate bankster media wants to daily terrorize and melt your mind with would be a good start.

Text with below video:

Uploaded by on May 20, 2011

A special presentation from Luke Rudkowski about the Chicken Whisperer in Georgia.

The Chicken Conspiracy by Luke Rudkowski


Related Links:

* * * *

[click here for entire post, re-posted from here]:

should ronald mcdonald go the way of joe camel?

from boston globe: RE "Pressure could make Ronald grimace" (Business, May 18): Finally, people are beginning to see Ronald McDonald for who he is, and he is certainly not a pro-health do-gooder, as described by McDonald’s. Ronald is a sophisticated marketing tool, used by McDonald’s to hook kids to unhealthy food. Ronald may be the most obvious marketing gimmick, but the dubious mascot is not alone. Happy Meals with toy giveaways, online game sites, and playgrounds at McDonald’s franchises are just a few examples of a McDonald’s marketing strategy that hinges on attracting kids before they are even aware of how marketing affects them. The consequences of this marketing strategy are grim, as the doctors and nurses who are on the front lines of our public health crisis know better than anyone. [source with more text and links]

The above is a sideblog post from this source:

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Joe Lieberman, Connecticut Criminal

Text with below video:
Uploaded by wearechange on May 17, 2011

Senator Lieberman says he will do something about terrorists dining at Pentagon

Please nicely Call Senators Lieberman's office and remind him to keep his promise.

D.C 202.224.4041

CT 860.549.8463

* * * *
* * * *

* * * *
* * * *

Americans more wary about Joe Lieberman, as he doing more damage than any terrorists could dream of. Is the power grid so vulnerable because the power grid is on the internet, really Joe? Why not make the power grid, banks, etc. more secure, huh Asshole?

Joe Lieberman U..S. needs Internet kill switch like China

Text with video:

Uploaded by on Jun 21, 2010

During an appearance on CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley, Joe Lieberman talks about the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act bill.
Joe Lieberman thinks that the United states should have a the power to shut down the Internet just like China.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. This site is for informational purposes only; it is not for referrals to programs. We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.

* * * *

[click here] for:

New World Order Assholes want more Wars

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)


Barack Obama's Forged Hawaiian Birth Certificate Scandal

Maybe there is something to this ...

Text with below video:

Uploaded by on May 20, 2011

Alex talks with author and investigative journalist Jerome Corsi about the Obama birth certificate fiasco. Corsi is the author of Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President, now available at the Infowars Store. In the book, Corsi assembles evidence that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of the presidency and has spent millions of dollars in legal fees to avoid providing the American people with something as simple as a long-form birth certificate.

Jerome Corsi: White House Running Scared Over Latest Discovery of Obama's True Origins 1/3

2 of 3

3 of 3

More recent Alex Jones videos embedded here:

w/ Paul Craig Roberts:

* * * *
* * * *

* * * *
* * * *

I, Steven G. Erickson, have been asked why I blog, blog, and blog, so angrily. Well, when I co-founded the Stafford Springs, Connecticut, Crime Watch, Town Constable (Police Officer) "Fat Frank" Prochaska told me he'd arrest me if I proposed legislation to elected officials and seemed to want to take my wife away from me. He was a no personality idiot living with Mommy. So, he slammed me against my house and assaulted me, and then later arrested me for having called 9-11 when a drug dealer I wanted out of the area bit my ear and punched me repeatedly in the face and fled the scene. [that story with pictures of me and my former European Lingerie Model Wife]

The former selectman John Julian of Stafford Springs, Connecticut, told me to sell my properties to his mob friends, "Or Else". I told John that if I didn't get a tractor trailer sized dumpster like his mob friends got when they bought rental properties to get rid of initial debris, I would paint one of the main properties on the way into Stafford, near the town green and cannon, pink. I further told him I put a row boat up on the roof, and paint a big sign, "Steve's Oar House", and then tell the media why if I didn't get the dumpster. I was just being an ass back to him. That is when Connecticut State Police Officers threatened brutality and murdering me.

Prosecutor Keith Courier allegedly got a blow job, or blow jobs, from a prostitute "tenant" who moved in without my permission, Lana Thompson. Courier told me on the phone if I evicted Lana I would be arrested and go to prison.

I was later arrested for resisting being mugged.

Why should I have to pay for a prosecutor's blow jobs? Courier refused to give me AR, Accelerated Rehabilitation, a program I was entitled to as a first offender, for the charges of my resisting being mugged on my own property. I got a year in prison for having pepper sprayed the mugger, one of the police informants sent out by police. Since self-defense isn't legal in Connecticut, the mugger who committed felonies stalking me, threatening my life, and trying to rob me at knife point was given immunity to prosecute me.

Peter Coukos, a crack smoking, alcoholic, prostitute user, possible psychopath was allegedly given first dibbs on my rental properties and offered help in getting a gun permit to carry concealed pistols by Stafford Police Officer Frank Prochaska and Stafford Resident State Trooper Mulcahey to sexually stalk and harass my then 14 year old daughter, help enforce their "no dating policy" on me, and terrorize me out of the State of Connecticut.

I could go on, and on. My latest letter to my Vermont elected officials [click here, post includes my mugshot]

I have nothing, my daughter and most of my family won't talk to me and I have a bogus criminal and prison record, for retaliation and for my Free Speech, not for crimes committed. I was held in the US as a political prisoner. I'm angry. There is no one who'll do anything from the local Town Hall to US President. So, I blog.

stevengerickson AT yahoo Dot com

[click here], or click on top banner, to go to top of blog


Friday, May 20, 2011

Waking up Hungover after Whore F*cking- The Obama Metaphor

Image stolen from here, The Kenny's Sideshow blog, a great place to view videos, photos, and writing about 9-11 Truth and other topics.

I don't know what it is like to wake up hungover regretting having been with ladies of ill repute. Those who voted for Barack Obama, or are middle America, or are flag wavers must feel like they've woken up hung over after f*cking a whore, metaphorically.

Sorry Rob (this post, cross posted,, I know you like to read more eloquent words, but the inflammatory word and Obama belong in the same sentence. Obama seems to be owned by big banks, corporations, and those who profit from all out war and enslavement.

First, do we believe with some of the lowest real ratings of a US President ever, during the start of an election cycle, that a politician bags Boogeyman and then secretly has the body dumped in the ocean?

Has Obama kept to any of the meat of his campaign promises? Well then, when wasn't he lying?

Military jets, seemingly armed with all weapons that fill fit under the wings are flying all over America at tree top level. They are not protecting us, they're terrorizing us. I know excuses are being used for military drones being flown all over the US, and it isn't about drug smuggling and illegal aliens. The crash of the dollar would mean that We the People are the number one enemy to those really in charge of the US Government.

They will stop at nothing to eliminate our ability to rise up and challenge their organized crime empire. Why aren't more Americans demanding to know where trillions of dollars of their money went as Donald Rumsfeld started to try to explain on the hot seat, September 10, 2001?

If cops in the US can literally just pull you over and take all your cash saying you have cash, and cash is used to buy drugs, you can be robbed of your cash by police anywhere, anytime. That theme is talked about in the first video embedded in [this post]. Paul Craig Roberts jokes that there is no longer any 4th Amendment Constitutional protection, police can just show up and check your home for guns and drugs, flushing a toilet is probable cause that you are destroying drug evidence. Video also embedded in [this link].

The Federal Reserve "Bank" is really a corporation, a consortium of the richest and most powerful. Why isn't this corporation audited, and why aren't they paying taxes? Why are we the people paying for a thousand, or so, military bases of occupation worldwide? Why are there at least 4 theaters of war, illegal occupation of sovereign nations, when the American people neither want, nor would vote for these? Why are there joint military exercises with police in all major cities and transportation hubs almost daily? Why is okay for US authorities to voice opposition to other countries violations of international law, violations of human rights, and the across the board torture, when they are advocates of it?

Why hasn't even one person been arrested and prosecuted in the corporate/banking scandal in the aftermath of 9-11? Why hasn't even one Wall Street banker been arrested? Bernie doesn't count as he didn't puppeteer the US Government into getting US taxpayer bailout money as a bonus for committing the biggest fraud and thefts ever.

Why did the price of heroin go from $20 a bag to $5, and from 4 percent pure to 70, on US streets after there were US boots on the ground in Afghanistan? Why is Columbia possibly the 3rd biggest receiver of covert military and black ops US taxpayer dollars? Why is cocaine so cheap, available, and concentrated, everywhere in America? Are US Presidents from Ronald Reagan on, just merely worldwide drug lords and warlords?

Corporations are not bad, if they are properly regulated, aren't too big to fail, aren't enemies to small business, and aren't monopolies. Corporate raiders and banksters who act as government are the biggest enemies to freedom and to all average people worldwide. We need to seek out the enemy before they come knocking on our door, pull us off the streets for detention, beat us up, and/or kill us for getting in their way. The venue is going to be on our terms, or theirs. So, what is your choice citizen?


Imperialism: Bankers, Drug Wars and Genocide

The below is re-posted [from here]
I found the link on a great blog which often posts on 9-11 Truth, The Kenny's Sideshow blog.

James Petras

In May 2011, Mexican investigators uncovered another mass clandestine grave with dozens of mutilated corpses; bringing the total number of victims to 40,000 killed since 2006 when the Calderon regime announced its “war on drug traffickers”. Backed by advisers, agents and arms, the White House has been the principal promotor of a ‘war’ that has totally decimated Mexico’s society and economy.

If Washington has been the driving force for the regime’s war, Wall Street banks have been the main instruments ensuring the profits of the drug cartels. Every major US bank has been deeply involved in laundering hundreds of billions of dollars in drug profits, for the better part of the past decade.

Mexico’s descent into this inferno has been engineered by the leading US financial and political institutions, each supporting ‘one side or the other’ in the bloody “total war” which spares no one, no place and no moment in time. While the Pentagon arms the Mexican government and the US Drug Enforcement Agency enforces the “military solution”, the biggest US banks receive, launder and transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to the drug lords’ accounts, who then buy modern arms, pay private armies of assassins and corrupt untold numbers of political and law enforcement officials on both sides of the border.

Mexico’s Descent in the Inferno

Everyday scores, if not hundreds, of corpses – appear in streets and or are found in unmarked graves; dozens are murdered in their homes, cars, public transport, offices and even hospitals; known and unknown victims in the hundreds are kidnapped and disappear; school children, parents, teachers, doctors and businesspeople are seized in broad daylight and held for ransom or murdered in retaliation. Thousands of migrant workers are kidnapped, robbed, ransomed, murdered and evidence is emerging that some are sold into the illegal ‘organ trade’. The police are barricaded in their commissaries; the military, if and when it arrives, takes out its frustration on entire cities, shooting more civilians than cartel soldiers. Everyday life revolves around surviving the daily death toll; threats are everywhere, the armed gangs and military patrols fire and kill with virtual impunity. People live in fear and anger.

The Free Trade Agreement: The Sparks that lit the Inferno

In the late 1980’s, Mexico was in crisis, but the people chose a legal way out: they elected a President, Cuahtemoc Cardenas, on the basis of his national program to promote the economic revitalization of agriculture and industry. The Mexican elite, led by Carlos Salinas of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) chose otherwise and subverted the election: The electorate was denied its victory; the peaceful mass protests were ignored. Salinas and subsequent Mexican presidents vigorously pursued a free trade agreement (NAFTA) with the US and Canada, which rapidly drove millions of Mexican farmers, ranchers and small business people into bankruptcy. Devastation led to the flight of millions of immigrant workers. Rural movements of debtors flourished and ebbed, were co-opted or repressed. The misery of the legal economy contrasted with the burgeoning wealth of the traffickers of drugs and people, which generated a growing demand for well-paid armed auxiliaries as soldiers for the cartels. The regional drug syndicates emerged out of the local affluence.

In the new millennium, popular movements and a new electoral hope arose: Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO). By 2006 a vast peaceful electoral movement promised substantial social and economic reforms to ‘integrate millions of disaffected youth’. In the parallel economy, the drug cartels were expanding and benefiting from the misery of millions of workers and peasants marginalized by the Mexican elite, who had plundered the public treasury, speculated in real estate, robbed the oil industry and created enormous privatized monopolies in the communication and banking sectors.

In 2006, millions of Mexican voters were once again denied their electoral victory: The last best hope for a peaceful transformation was dashed. Backed by the US Administration, Felipe Calderon stole the election and proceeded to launch the “War on Drug Traffickers” strategy dictated by Washington.

The War Strategy Escalates the Drug War: The Banking Crises Deepens the Ties with Drug Traffickers

The massive escalation of homicides and violence in Mexico began with the declaration of a war on the drug cartels by the fraudulently elected President Calderon, a policy pushed initially by the Bush Administration and subsequently strongly backed by the Obama – Clinton regime. Over 40,000 Mexican soldiers filled the streets, towns and barrios – violently assaulting citizens - especially young people. The cartels retaliated by escalating their armed assaults on police. The war spread to all the major cities and along the major highways and rural roads; murders multiplied and Mexico descended further into a Dantesque inferno. Meanwhile, the Obama regime ‘reaffirmed’ its support for a militarist solution on both sides of the border: Over 500,000 Mexican immigrants were seized and expelled from the US; heavily armed border patrols multiplied. Cross border gun sales grew exponentially .The US “market” for Mexican manufactured goods and agricultural products shrank, further widening the pool for cartel recruits while the supply of high powered weapons increased. White House gun and drug policies strengthened both sides in this maniacal murderous cycle: The US government armed the Calderon regime and the American gun manufacturers sold guns to the cartels through both legal and underground arms sales. Steady or increasing demand for drugs in the US – and the grotesque profits derived from trafficking and sales--- remained the primary driving force behind the tidal wave of violence and societal disintegration in Mexico.

Drug profits, in the most basic sense, are secured through the ability of the cartels to launder and transfer billions of dollars through the US banking system. The scale and scope of the US banking-drug cartel alliance surpasses any other economic activity of the US private banking system. According to US Justice Department records, one bank alone, Wachovia Bank (now owned by Wells Fargo), laundered $378.3 billion dollars between May 1, 2004 and May 31, 2007 (The Guardian, May 11, 2011). Every major bank in the US has served as an active financial partner of the murderous drug cartels – including Bank of America, Citibank, and JP Morgan, as well as overseas banks operating out of New York, Miami and Los Angeles, as well as London.

While the White House pays the Mexican state and army to kill Mexicans suspected of drug trafficking, the US Justice Department belatedly slaps a relatively small fine on the major US financial accomplice to the murderous drug trade, Wachovia Bank, spares its bank officials from any jail time and allows major cases to lapse into dismissal.

The major agency of the US Treasury involved in investigating money laundering, the Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, deliberately ignored the blatant collaboration of US banks with drug terrorists, concentrating almost their entire staff and resources on enforcing sanctions against Iran. For seven years, Treasury Undersecretary Stuart Levey used his power as head of the Department for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence to pursue Israel’s phony “war on terrorism” against Iran, rather than shut down Wachovia’s money-laundering operations with the Mexican drug terrorists. In this period of time an estimated 40,000 Mexican civilian have been killed by the cartels and the army.

Without US arms and financial services supporting both the illegitimate Mexican regimes and the drug cartels – there could be no “drug war”, no mass killings and no state terror. The simple acts of stopping the flood of cheap subsidized US agriculture products into Mexico and de-criminalizing the use and purchase of cocaine in the US would dry up the pool of ‘cartel soldiers’ from the bankrupted Mexican peasantry and the cut back the profits and demand for illegal drugs in the US market.

The Drug Traffickers, the Banks and the White House

If the major US banks are the financial engines which allow the billion dollar drug empires to operate, the White House, the US Congress and the law enforcement agencies are the basic protectors of these banks. Despite the deep and pervasive involvement of the major banks in laundering hundreds of billions of dollars in illicit funds, the “court settlements” pursued by US prosecutors have led to no jail time for the bankers. One court’s settlement amounted to a fine of $50 million dollars, less than 0.5% of one of the banks (the Wachovia/Wells Fargo bank) $12.3 billion profits for 2009 (The Guardian, May 11, 2011). Despite the death of tens of thousands of Mexican civilians, US executive branch directed the DEA, the federal prosecutors and judges to impose such a laughable ‘punishment’ on Wachovia for its illegal services to the drug cartels. The most prominent economic officials of the Bush and Obama regimes, including Summers, Paulson, Geithner, Greenspan, Bernacke et al, are all long term associates, advisers and members of the leading financial houses and banks implicated in laundering the billions of drug profits.

Laundering drug money is one of the most lucrative sources of profit for Wall Street; the banks charge hefty commissions on the transfer of drug profits, which they then lend to borrowing institutions at interest rates far above what – if any – they pay to drug trafficker depositors. Awash in sanitized drug profits, these US titans of the finance world can easily buy their own elected officials to perpetuate the system.

Even more important and less obvious is the role of drug money in the recent financial meltdown, especially during its most critical first few weeks.

According to the head of United Nation’s Office on Drugs and Crime, Antonio Maria Costa, “In many instances, drug money (was)… currently the only liquid investment capital…. In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system’s main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor…interbank loans were funded by money that originated from drug trade and other illegal activities… (there were) signs that some banks were rescued in that way.” (Reuters, January 25,2009. US edition). Capital flows from the drug billionaires were key to floating Wachovia and other leading banks. In a word: the drug billionaires saved the capitalist financial system from collapse!


By the end of the first decade of the 21st century, it has become clear that capital accumulation, at least in North America, is intimately linked to generalized violence and drug trafficking. Because capital accumulation is dependent on financial capital, and the latter is dependent on the industry profits from the multi-hundred-billion dollar drug trade, the entire ensemble is embedded in the ‘total war’ over drug profits. In times of deep crises the very survival of the US financial system – and through it, the world banking system – is linked to the liquidity of the drug “industry”.

At the most superficial level the destruction of Mexican and Central American societies – encompassing over 100 million people – is a result of a conflict between drug cartels and the political regimes of the region. At a deeper level there is a multiplier or “ripple effect” related to their collaboration: the cartels draw on the support of the US banks to realize their profits; they spend hundreds of millions on the US arms industry and others to secure their supplies, transport and markets; they employ tens of thousands of recruits for their vast private armies and civilian networks and they purchase the compliance of political and military officials on both sides of the borders

For its part, the Mexican government acts as a conduit for US Pentagon/Federal police, Homeland Security, drug enforcement and political apparatuses prosecuting the ‘war’, which has put Mexican lives, property and security at risk. The White House stands at the strategic center of operations – the Mexican regime serves as the front-line executioners.

On one side of the “war on drugs” are the major Wall Street banks; on the other side, the White House and its imperial military strategists and in the ‘middle’ are 90 million Mexicans and 40,000 murder victims and counting.

Relying on political fraud to impose economic deregulation in the 1990’s (neo-liberalism), the US policies led directly to the social disintegration, criminalization and militarization of the current decade. The sophisticated narco-finance economy has now become the most advanced stage of neo-liberalism. When the respectable become criminals, the criminals become respectable.

The issue of genocide in Mexico has been determined by the empire and its “knowing” bankers and cynical rulers.


* * * *
* * * *

You need the below to have the above.

Mark Adams gives a speech about electronic election rigging in the State of Florida back in 2009. He goes on to talk about the pitfalls of policing for the government, not the people, and the 101 on the rigging of the courts:

The below text re-posted from:

Why Does the Government Ignore Our Wishes?

To understand the answer, you must first understand that there is no difference between the labels placed on the form of government and that the real issue is how can government agents be controlled to prevent their abuse of power.
All forms of government, no matter what you call them, result in rule by an aristocracy as government agents are given various powers over the general public. Some agents have very limited power and some have vast power. Therefore, if you want liberty and justice and don’t want tyranny and oppression, the question that any intelligent person should ask is, “How can we keep aristocratic government agents from abusing their power?”
Our Nation’s Founders understood this, and in the Constitution, they provided us with the means to hold government agents accountable. However, those means have been undermined, and the two most powerful means of controlling government have been eliminated.
If you have wondered why the government passes laws that virtually everyone opposes, like the bank bailout, and why the government refuses to investigate and prosecute obvious crimes, like torture and murder, check out my speech at the Labor Day rally in Deland, Florida.
To understand why judges, government agents, and those with the power to influence them can get away with criminal conduct like rigging elections, ignoring the law to throw cases and other outrageous crimes, see Why does the U.S. government torture people? The facts are right here for you to see if you can handle the truth.
Once you learn the truth, will you spread the word to your contacts or will you go into denial? Will you stop supporting politicians, “news” and “reform” organizations which constantly lie to you or will you keep supporting them while vainly hoping that one day they will start telling you the truth and respecting your wishes and your rights?
Will you support organizations like the Daily Censored, Project Censored, the Election Defense Alliance, and Project Vote Count or will you just hope that someone else will take action to spread the real news and protect your rights to control the government?
If you want to know how a few people in each county can take action to make sure that the votes are counted accurately or that a fraudulent vote count is exposed, see How to Stop Election Theft and How Not to Stop Election Theft?
In case you just can’t believe that anyone would steal elections in the good old U.S.A, see Have American Elections Really Been Stolen? – The Proof. It was a Top Scoop on Scoop for several days. See it at
If you still just can’t believe that the government would violate the law in the land that promises liberty and justice for all, see Would Congressional Democrats Cover Up Neo-Con Election Fraud? No Way, Right?!?! This article was also a Top Scoop on Scoop for several days. See it at

Listen, learn, wake up and take action before it is too late!

Please spread the news. Those who want to keep the public from understanding how to control the government certainly won’t do it.

* * * *
* * * *

This blogger's email: stevengerickson At yahoo Dot com

My beef:


Hit Counter